1. All the plaintiffs' lawsuits listed in the [Attachment 1] Nos. 2 through 171 are dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s February 9, 2015.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiffs are those who have an address at the time of Ansan, and the plaintiff A is the plaintiff A B of Ansan-si.

B. On September 2010, In accordance with Article 13(3) of the Act on Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure (hereinafter “Private Investment Act”), Ansan-si refers to the method under Article 4 subparag. 2 of the Act on Public-Private Partnerships (hereinafter “BTL”) between the lessor and the D Public-Private Partnership (hereinafter “C”) and the D Public-Private Partnership (BTL).

[Method] In 2009, the concession agreement was concluded for E-Lease projects (BTL) at the time of 2009.

C. Since Ansan City, pursuant to Article 13(3) of the Act on Public-Private Partnerships on December 6, 2012, Article 4 subparag. 1 of the Act on Public-Private Partnerships (hereinafter referred to as “F”) is the method of Subparag. 1 of the Act on Public-Private Partnerships and Public-Private Partnerships (hereinafter referred to as “BO”).

[Method] The concession agreement was concluded for the amendment of G Private Investment Project at the time of Ansan.

Plaintiff

On January 30, 2015, A filed a request with the Defendant for disclosure of information on the details of G-related Private Investment Project (hereinafter referred to as “instant B-L Convention,” and “instant B-O agreement,” in common name, on January 30, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “instant claim”).

E. On February 9, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to refuse the disclosure of information to Plaintiff A on the ground that the part of “the text” of each of the instant agreements (Nos. 2 and 3) is disclosed to the public, and that with respect to the “Supplementary” of the instant BTL agreement,” the “Supplementary” of the instant BTO agreement, and the “Supplementary” of the instant BTO agreement (hereinafter “information subject to non-disclosure”), the Defendant’s refusal of disclosure of information constitutes “information concerning business secrets of juristic persons and organizations, which is likely to seriously undermine legitimate interests of juristic persons and organizations” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

F. The Plaintiff A is dissatisfied with this, and on February 13, 2015.