logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.06.15 2017고단1954
병역법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a religious religious believers B.

The Defendant, as a person subject to enlistment in active duty service on February 17, 2017, received a written notice of enlistment in the name of the head of the regional military affairs office in Daegu-gu and the head of the regional military affairs office on March 28, 2017 from the Defendant’s house located in the Daegu-gu Suwon-gu C and D to the 50 association from March 28, 2017, but failed to enlist without justifiable grounds for more than three days from the date of enlistment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a list of persons notified of enlistment in full-time reserve service, delivery information, and notification sent to the Military Manpower Administration during March 17;

1. Article 88(1)1 of the pertinent Act on Criminal facts provides for the first sentence of the Military Service Act [Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act] [Article 88(1) of the same Act for the purpose of embodying the most fundamental citizen’s duty of national defense, and where the State’s security is not ensured because the aforementioned duty of military service is not fulfilled properly, the dignity and value as human beings cannot be guaranteed.

Therefore, military service is ultimately aimed at ensuring the dignity and value of all citizens as human beings, and the freedom of conscience of conscientious objectors cannot be said to be superior to the above constitutional legal interests.

As a result, even if the freedom of conscience of a defendant is restricted pursuant to Article 37(2) of the Constitution for the above constitutional legal interests, it is a justifiable restriction under the Constitution (see Constitutional Court Order 2002Hun-Ga1, August 26, 2004; Constitutional Court Order 2008Hun-Ga22, August 30, 201). In addition, the so-called conscientious objection based on one’s conscience does not constitute “justifiable cause” as provided for an exception to punishment under the above Military Service Act, and punishment does not violate the freedom of conscience under Article 19 of the Constitution.

B. In addition, Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Korea is a member, Article 18 of the same Act applies to those who refuse military service according to conscience.

arrow