1. Defendant H Co., Ltd.: (a) Plaintiff D’s KRW 111,473,787; and (b) Plaintiff E’s KRW 67,320,634; and (c) each of the said payments on August 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A and B shall be the land and the building on the ground of Pyeongtaek-si I (hereinafter “instant building”).

Defendant C is the owner of the instant building, and Defendant C is a person with a right to lease on a deposit basis with the southwest-west 93.92 square meters, among the first floor of the instant building, who operates an entertainment drinking house with the trade name J in the relevant part. 2) Plaintiff D is the owner of K land and its ground buildings (hereinafter “instant building 2”) and L land and its ground buildings (hereinafter “instant third building”). The owner of the instant building is a person who operates an entertainment drinking house of M in the instant building 2, and a person who operates an entertainment drinking house of N in the instant building 3.

3) Plaintiff E is an O land and its ground buildings (hereinafter “instant 4 buildings”).

4) Plaintiff F is an owner of the instant 4 building, who operates an entertainment tavern in the trade name of P. P. 4 (hereinafter “instant building”). Plaintiff F is a person who operates an entertainment tavern in the name of R from Q ground building (hereinafter “instant building”) and from the instant 1 to 5 (hereinafter “each instant building”).

5) Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant G”)

(A) The Corporation is entrusted with the instant land and is entrusted with the construction of Pyeongtaek-si Complex on the ground of the said land in size of 3 underground floors, 14 floors above ground, 48 households of multi-family housing, and officetels 115 rooms below the said land (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”).

Defendant H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant H”) is a project implementer that implemented the project.

(B) The construction of this case was contracted by Defendant G for the construction of this case. Defendant H, after the completion of the instant construction on November 20, 2015, commenced and obtained approval for the use of a new building on February 2, 2018. Following the instant construction, the instant building Nos. 2, 3, and 4 (hereinafter “building subject to appraisal”).

In addition, there were damages, such as the subsidence of the light, the floor impact, the volume of the opening, the rupture, the rupture (0.3m or more, glass damage, the rupture, the rupture, the rupture, the rupture of the floor, the structural transformation, the rupture of the rupture, and the