1. Of the part concerning the principal lawsuit in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following part exceeds the part ordering performance.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the dismissal as provided in the following paragraph (2), and therefore, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The main sentence of Article 420 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which refers to “the instant land” (hereinafter “instant land”) and “the land of this case,” and each part of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., bbbbbb, cream, croc, e., v., e., vi., e., g., the part of the instant land

(b) On the 4th page of the first instance judgment, the term "(b) and part(b)" in the 10th page of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter "the part(b) and the 797 square meters ("the part(b)") shall be read as "the part(b) and 797 square meters(hereinafter "the part(b)", and each "(b) and the land

The 5th to 8th of the first instance judgment are as follows.

“The land in this case” in Section 5, 9 of the first instance judgment, “F, as a dry field that cultivates crops, the area of the instant dival part of the instant dival part of the dival part of the instant dival part of the dival part of the dival part of the instant case, as an orchard, the warehouse, house, and its site (the area excluding warehouses and house, is packed in cement); and the part of the instant dival part of the dival part of the instant dival part of the instant case, as “the entire land in this case,” in Section 12, 14, 5, and 21 of the first instance judgment, as “the entire part of the instant dival part of the instant dival part of the instant case,” and Section 15, as “each part of the instant 1/3 portion of the Plaintiff’s share of each 1/3 of the inherited portion,” respectively.

The following matters shall be added after the 5th sentence of the first instance judgment.

“The 3 Plaintiffs asserted that F occupied the instant G as orchard and the instant 7th part of the GG, etc., for 20 years or longer, as small arable land.

However, the part of this case is between the boundary lines of roads located in E forest and land and the boundary lines of posts fixed to support dys located in the area of the instant dys.