logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.10.01 2014고단1059
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) constructed the victim’s neighborhood living facilities (public bath building) in the “G” restaurant in the operation of the Seoul Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City E Victim F, and (b) constructed the victim’s “H and I”; (c) due to the lack of funds, the land has been left out of the auction; (d) has been invested in order to recover the land from the auction to continue the construction; and (e) has changed the amount of investment to KRW 200 million; and (e) the victim promised to transfer the land and the building permit to the victim within two months after the victim made an investment as a net interest; (b) the Defendant promised to show the site of the construction directly to the victim F couple; and (c) had the victim lawfully exercised the right of retention; and (d) the said lien and the sale contract for K Apartment Apartment apartment, the Defendant was transferred to the victim as security for investment.

However, K Apartment Corporation was not proceeding properly at the time due to the shortage of funds, and the defendant retired from the office of joint representative director of LA company with the authority to dispose of the above apartment house on August 26, 2010, and in order to sell the above apartment house to the victim actually, the apartment sales contract for apartment was not substantially worth the security, and it was not capable of properly constructing the house due to the lack of funds. The right of retention at the construction site of the present neighborhood living facilities was transferred to J as the defendant's creditor on April 27, 201 for the repayment of debts to the defendant's creditor on April 27, 201. This case's land was also the land owned by J under the successful bid, and around May 20 of the same year the name of the owner of the above construction was changed to J, and there was no right to the above construction work to the defendant around this time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, deceiving the victim and deceiving him from the victim on January 19, 2012.

arrow