logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.23 2015고단216
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

The facts charged of this case

1. On March 2010, the Defendant, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Office 303 Office, operated by the Defendant on March 3, 2010, set up an apartment building with the victim D’s “China’s Seocho-gu International Nature, and may impose a big amount upon the invitation of Korean investors. In the event of profits, the Defendant made a false statement to give adequate compensation.

However, at the time, the defendant did not participate in the Chinese apartment construction project, and was liable for the debt of KRW 60 million, and there was no intention or ability to repay the principal and interest to the victim due to no particular property or revenue, and was given money from the victim, and was thought to use it as loan obligations and living expenses.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 1.5 million from the victim on May 25, 2010 to the account in the name of the Defendant and received the deposit of KRW 1.5 million from the victim.

1.A deposit of 12,350,000 won has been received on seven occasions as shown in the following:

2. On September 2010, the Defendant concluded that, at the place under the preceding paragraph at the end of the end of the day, “The Defendant would collect money borrowed to the trading office, and there is insufficient expenses.” On January 25, 201, when receiving the advance payment from a contract in China, the Defendant would repay all the borrowed money and give sufficient compensation.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not plan to receive advance payments in China, and did not have any property or revenue, and did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed money to the victim, and was given money from the victim to use it as loan obligations and living expenses.

The Defendant, as above, deceiving the victim, received KRW 50,00 from the victim on September 15, 201 to the account in the name of the Defendant and received KRW 50,000 from the victim on September 15, 201, and vice versa.

8.A deposit of 10,240,000 won has been received over 20 times as in 27.

3. On March 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the place specified in the preceding paragraph at the end of the horse, the Defendant “in China, like a punishment.”

arrow