1. The defendant is not guilty. 2. The defendant will notify the defendant of the summary of the judgment.

1. On September 1, 2012, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case, under the title of the "Multiple minutes of residents" in the Daejeon Sung-gu D apartment on September 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) the representative who passed the resolution of dismissal of the president of the council of the council of the council of the council of the members of the council of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members of the council of members

However, even though the relevant company did not present the above 13 million won in relation to the selection of the entrusted management company, the representative, including the victim E, who is 120 Dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong dong, stated that the amount of 93 million won has passed through the proposal presented.

The Defendant, by pointing out such false facts, damaged the honor of the victims.

2. Determination

A. Whether a management company presented management fees of KRW 13 million to an entrusted management company for three years or not, the Defendant also recognized the same act as stated in the facts charged. However, the Defendant asserts to the effect that the content of his/her statement is consistent with objective truth and does not constitute a false act. 2) According to each recording (No. 6 and No. 16) and a recording file (Evidence No. 37) submitted by the Defendant, the Defendant was present at the council of occupants’ representatives held on July 17, 2012, as the Daejeon Seosung-gu D apartment (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”). ② The above council of occupants’ representatives was the main agenda to determine whether to re-contract with N, an existing entrusted management company, and ③ the commission fee that was presented before the aforementioned conference was presented at N, the total area of the apartment house of KRW 8.66 won per square meter (No. 1 bill), 8.35 won (No. 22), and 369.369.