Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving FUMA125 Oba.

On December 20, 2016, the Defendant driven the upper 06:25, and proceeded along three lanes from the opposite side of the valley to the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the road.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to thoroughly drive a person engaged in driving service and safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the right side of the victim E (the other 44 years old) driving at the right side of the victim E (the other 44 years old) who turn to the left in accordance with normal signals from the front part of the Otoba, which the Defendant was driving in front of the Otoba, which had been driving by the Defendant due to the negligence of proceeding the intersection in the

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim E, such as a thring in the right franchisa, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim G ( South, 28 years of age) who was on the back franchisa of the Defendant’s driving, due to approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The actual survey report and photographs related to traffic accidents;

1. Report on internal investigation (as to the violation of the suspect’s signal);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime while driving a motor vehicle on the ground of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, in violation of the signal, and that the degree of injury suffered by the victims is disadvantageous.

However, the defendant's mistake was recognized, and all victims agreed to do so.

And the defendant.