logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.02.24 2016고정822
식품위생법위반
Text

The punishment against the Defendants shall be prescribed by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is an auditor and a substantial representative of the C Co., Ltd. in Asia-si.

With respect to the names, manufacturing methods, quality and nutrition labelling of foods, etc., genetic materials, associations, foods, etc. and the tracking and management labelling of food history, no one shall place any indication or advertisement that has efficacy or efficacy in the prevention and treatment of diseases or that may cause confusion as to pharmaceutical products or health functional foods by means of containers, packages, radio, television, newspapers, magazines, music, images, printed materials, signboards, the Internet or other methods.

Nevertheless, from July 2014 to May 2016, the Defendant promoted the fire extinguishing function of 250 ml2 products of the early coal shot water produced by day-to-day in the Internet shopping mall, G market, etc., and discharges the dys of the body and discharges the dys of the body and discharges the dys of the dys of the dys of the dysium and the dys of the skin disease.

There is a fact that the sales of approximately KRW 20,000 won have occurred through the advertisement.

As a result, the Defendant advertised that there is a efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or that there is a possibility of confusion as medicine or health functional food.

2. Defendant B is a corporation established with the purpose of selling and selling food and beverages together.

The defendant A, the representative of the defendant at the above date, time, and place, has committed the same violation as the above facts concerning the defendant's duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Along with the integrated information network for management of false exaggerated advertisements, online shopping mall closure photographs [the substantial representative of Defendant B Co., Ltd. advertised the shot water products, Defendant A, a representative of Defendant B, using an expression that would have efficacy or efficacy for the prevention and treatment of diseases, or cause confusions with medicine or functional health foods.

Defendant

A also emphasizes the image of the treatment effect at the time of police investigation.

arrow