Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,00,000,000 as a fine for a violation of road traffic law (driving) at the Suwon District Court’s Suwon District Court’s House on December 7, 2007, and on October 1, 2013, a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,00 as a fine for the same crime was issued.

Although Defendant violated Article 44(1)(d) of the Road Traffic Act on two occasions, Defendant 2 driven a B-E car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.171% in blood around March 24, 2017 and proceeded with approximately five meters in front of the Incheon Yeonsu-gu Incheon apartment C apartment 104, while driving a B-E car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.171% in blood around March 24, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, investigation reports (reports attached to the summary order of the same kind of power), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is that the defendant, even though he had the record of the same kind of crime, is driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol at the same time. However, although the defendant was in the apartment complex where he was living through a substitute driver after drinking alcohol, he was in the apartment complex where he was living in the apartment complex, but the substitute driver did not complete parking, he was able to drive a vehicle directly after leaving the site at the expense of the city in which he did not complete parking, the driving distance was short, the driving distance did not reach the violation of other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, the fact that the defendant did not repent his mistake later, and that the defendant's age, sex, occupation, environment, family relation, etc. were taken into account and determined the above punishment.