The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to misunderstanding of facts (i.e., fraud against the victim D in the part of fraud against the victim D, the defendant received money from the victim by stating that "to pay interest if he/she lends money for bond play," and actually used the borrowed money that the above victim received from the victim to H, etc. for the purpose of corporate bonds (loan) business by investing the borrowed money actually received from the victim to H, etc., so the above victim did not deceiving the above victim about the purpose of the borrowed money. As to the above crime Nos. 15 through 18 of the list of crimes, the defendant did not commit deception, such as this part of the facts charged, against the victim.

D. The part of the crime of fraud against the victim E and F provided that the above victims shall pay interest to the above victims when they borrowed money for the bond play, and actually invested in the bond business fund after receiving money from the above victims, and actually paid interest to the above victims by cash, etc., so the defendant did not deceiving the above victims.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant was living together with the victim D for about two years, and the victim E and F became aware of the aforementioned D’s friendship.

㈎ 피해자 D에 대한 사기 피고인은 2011. 6. 초순경 피해자 D이 운영하는 청주시 상당구 G에 있는 의류매장에서 피해자에게 “내 친구 H가 사채업을 하는데 나와 엄마도 돈을 H에게 빌려주고 이자를 많이 받았다. H에게 돈을 넣으면 이자로 최소 연 20%를 받을 것이니 H에게 줄 돈을 빌려줘 봐라”라고 거짓말을 하였다.

However, in fact, the defendant and the defendant have not received much interest by lending money to H, and the defendant has borrowed money from the victim.