beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: each of the "5,16 and 13, 5, i.e., the above personnel expenses and equipment costs of KRW 5,700,000," respectively, shall be dismissed as "the above personnel expenses and equipment costs of KRW 5,650,000," and the evidence additionally submitted at the court of first instance, which seems to meet part of the defendant's alleged facts, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of some of the testimony of the witness G at the court of first instance for the following reasons. Thus, this shall be accepted pursuant to the main sentence of
The above G stated in the court of first instance that “the plaintiff neglected to the dry field for a month in which he harvested from Hab, and neglected to the dry field for Hab, and did not have the above free water,” and thereafter, the plaintiff's dry field was supplied to the defendant. However, even according to the above G's testimony, G merely stated that the defendant representative director C made the above speech after he was supplied as the defendant's factory, and it was not directly confirmed at the time of delivery. Further, the above G was a person working as the defendant's production deputy or factory head from 2006 to the defendant's production deputy or factory head, and it cannot be ruled out the possibility of making the statement favorable to the defendant. According to the Gap evidence No. 6-2's evidence No. 6-2, it is difficult to view that the article, which was the plaintiff's dry field, "C," which had been engaged in the above salting work, took place in the plaintiff's dry field to the purport that it was against the defendant's testimony at the next time."
2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.