logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.03.09 2016고정22
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the D church in Changwon-si, Msan-si C, and is the head of E.

1. Any person who intends to establish a private school violating the Elementary and Secondary Education Act shall obtain authorization from the superintendent of the competent office of education, and shall not use the name of the school or recruit students without obtaining authorization for the establishment of the school, and shall not operate the facilities in de facto form of

However, from March 2, 2015 to November 12, 2015, the Defendant operated an alternative school under the name of “E” at the above D church from March 2, 2015 to November 12, 2015, and recruited 47 students subject to entrance to a high school once every three years, and operated the above E in de facto form of a school, such as Korean language studies, social studies, national history, science, morality, etc., English and Chinese language association as a course of specialized study, Chinese language association, etc., as a special course of study, computers, swimmings, Taekwondo, etc., as a course of study, two million won for admission fees, two million won for tuition fees, 30,000 won for day-to-day, 300,000 won for day-to-day, 300,000 won for day-to-day, and 30,000 won for day-to-day.

2. Any person who intends to alter purposes of a building for which approval for use in violation of the Building Act has been obtained, shall obtain permission from, or report to, the competent authorities;

However, the Defendant, without filing a report on the change of the purpose of use with the competent authorities from March 2, 2015 to August 9, 2015, operated E by installing lecture rooms, reading rooms, etc. on approximately 670 square meters of the first floor of the building of a cultural and assembly facility, as described in paragraph (1), as a religious facility, from March 2, 2015 to August 9, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol prepared by the police;

1. In cases of investigation reports (the current status of school personnel, etc. attached thereto) and the current status and curricula of attached school personnel;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to order rectification of violated buildings;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow