The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Criminal facts acknowledged by the court below are not specified in the summary of the grounds for appeal, and the victim's statement is not reliable.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty was erroneous.

2. The judgment of this Court

A. Regarding the assertion that the facts constituting an indecent act are not specified, the victim prepared a complaint to the effect that "the victim was indecent act from the defendant in the front line in the shift line section from June 25, 2013 to June 25, 2013," and the police stated that "from June 25, 2013 to June 09:17 to 09:23, the victim was indecent act from the defendant in the front line section of the subway line from the subway line 2 to the front line section of the subway line. The same shall apply to the case where the subway was 2 minutes and 3 f minutes, and was 6 minutes of indecent act." The charges of this case were repeated and testified at the lower court to the right side of the victim, and the victim was supposed with the victim's chest, and the victim was supposed with the victim's chest, and the victim was supposed with the victim's 4 minutes of his chest in the front line of the victim."

3) On the fourth trial of the lower court, the prosecutor made a statement to the effect that “the police did not take a face of indecent act any longer at the time when the police began to have a witness of an indecent act, and thereafter did not take a face of an indecent act, even if he knew of an indecent act in the future.” However, the lower court committed an indecent act against the victim “a about six minutes” during the fourth trial of the lower court, but committed an indecent act against the victim for six minutes.