Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant knew the personal information of C and opened an account under the name of the corporation in order to prevent the fraud by using such a passbook. The defendant conspired in E, F, and name-free persons to prevent the fraud.

Accordingly, E/F made a corporation (State) D as the representative of C in an unsound way, and the Defendant opened a bank account (Account Number G) in the name of D in the name of the (State) credit union located in Ansan-gu, Seosan-si on February 15, 2013.

On February 20, 2013, the name-freeist had the victim H who attempted to access the Nong Internet Bank website through the NAV site search at a non-permanent place and had the victim H enter financial information, such as the Nong bank account number (I), password, security card number, etc., in the victim's name, and obtained such information.

On February 20, 2013, at around 22:50, the person whose name was omitted had access through the Internet banking system to the information processing device managed by the said agricultural cooperative, and then had entered the information of the victim’s agricultural bank account, which was discovered as above, and transferred KRW 1,940,000 from the said agricultural bank account to the new cooperation account in the name of the said State.

As such, the Defendant acquired economic benefits by making an input of false information or improper order into an information processing device in collusion with E, F, or name defective persons, or by making an input of information without authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. Investigation report (investigation into criminal records);

1. Investigation report (investigation into D involving a stock company);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transfer;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 347-2 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of a sentence are relatively not relevant, and there are no criminal records of the same kind.