logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.09.09 2016고단1233
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2016, the Defendant: (a) went into a house of the victim D (n, 63 years old) located in Asan City and Asan City (n, 63 years old) on April 2016, and went into the house, and opened a door on the side of the house; (b) intrudes into the house; and (c) did not have any object to be stolen; (d) but did not have any intended object to be stolen.

2. Around May 11, 2016, the Defendant, who intrudes upon a residence and larceny, was in front of the house of the Victim F (71:00) located in Asan-si, Asan-si, on May 11, 2016, and went into front of the house of the Victim F (71:00). In front of the house, the Defendant removed the screen of the windows at the place, intrudes into the house, and ruptures into the house, and in which the amount of KRW 100,000 per annum owned by the victim on a small computer book is 10,000,000 in cash, which is 250,000 won in front of the wall stored in the inner and inner

On July 6, 2016, around 11:40 on July 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) intruded upon a residence and stolen Defendant: (b) was in front of the house of the Victim F (71: South and North) located in Asan City E on July 6, 2016; (c) went into the front of the house of the Victim F (71: 71: son); (d) went into the front of the said house; (d) one US dollars 1:2; (e) one 10 US dollars 1; and one 10,000 won of the market price in the inner room; and (e) one 10,000 won of the city price in the main room. The summary of the evidence was stolen.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of F and D;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) the fact that a person repeats a crime during the period of probation for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act; (b) the fact that the person committed a crime and commits a mistake; (c) the fact that the person committed a crime for livelihood; and

arrow