A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the Daegu District Court for a period of eight months, and was sentenced to six months of probation in the same court on November 5, 2015 at the same court, which became final and conclusive on November 13, 2015, and the sentence of probation was invalidated on November 13, 2015, and the parole period was expired on October 28, 2016 during the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Detention House.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 18:00 on September 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) deducted approximately KRW 72,000 (L) the market price of the victim’s possession from approximately KRW 72,00,000 (L) via an oil tank stored in the D Twit line, a vehicle operated by the Defendant; and (b) cut off KRW 500 (L) more than six times in total from the market price of the victims owned by the victims, as shown in the attached crime list, at around six times in total, as shown in the attached crime list.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E, F, G, H, I, and C;

1. Investigation report (related to the appearance of a vehicle driven by a suspect at the site);

1. Previous records before ruling: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of the same criminal records), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes significantly to this court;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act have the record of having already been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and in particular, the Defendant repeatedly committed each of the crimes of this case without being able to do so during the period of repeated crime resulting from the same crime, and did not reach an agreement with the victim F.