Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Incheon District Court on November 21, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Incheon District Court on March 17, 2009, respectively, and violated the provisions on the prohibition of drinking under the Road Traffic Act more than twice.

On August 8, 2018, the Defendant driven B-learning car from around 20 meters to around 16 in the south-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, where it is difficult to find out a place below the 0.182% alcohol concentration among blood transfusion 0.25%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of the driver at the home, investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver at home) and the situation of the driver at home;

1. Notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving and inquiry of the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and reporting of the results of confirmation before and after each disposition;

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had been punished twice due to drinking driving, and that the Defendant’s primary taking of the case is heavy, etc., which are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

The defendant's mistake is against the defendant, the defendant did not cause a traffic accident due to the driving of the drinking of this case, the previous criminal records of the defendant was in 2008 and 2009, and there has been no other criminal records until then.

In addition, the sentencing conditions recorded in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the sentence as ordered.