logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.23 2016고단713
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Text

Defendant

B Imprisonment for 6 months, each of the defendants A and C shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Defendant

A and C shall be subject to the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B, along with C on February 13, 2016, performed alcohol at the “F” entertainment drinking point located on the first floor Eth of the window E shopping mall at Changwon-si on February 13, 2016. While Defendant A demanded prompt singing, Defendant A, the manager of the said entertainment drinking shop (5 years old) did not enter the said entertainment shop because of the equity with the other customers of the victim G (5 years old) who is the manager of the said entertainment shop, and Defendant A did not enter it. Defendant A s plpl up and plaeed with the victim’s flaps by booming the flab, and Defendant B b flabeded with the victim’s flab, and fladdddd with the victim’s bridge.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. On February 13, 2016, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) reported fighting at the said entertainment shop; (b) and (c) on February 13, 2016, the Defendant sent to the police station of the Changwon Police Station of the Changwon Police Station, the Defendant: (a) was requested by a private person to voluntarily accompany the victim I to ascertain the details of fighting; (b) and (c) on the part of the victim, the Defendant was able to protect the G, the manager listed in the foregoing paragraph (1) and the 10 customers.

Nar made a public insultd the victim by publicly fluench, Nar, who is well aware of the fluench, recording fluen, Nar, who shows his identity and why he shows his identification in the fluench of the Republic of Korea.”

3. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) arrested Defendant B as a current offender of the offense of insult as described in the foregoing paragraph (2) from the police officer who belongs to the above slope I and the above HH District as the offender; (b) took care of Defendant B’s shoulder with his hand, and her shouldered the Defendant’s shoulder with his hand at one time, and assaulted the aboveJ’s face with his hand at one time with his right blus.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Each police statement made to J and I;

1. Voluntary accompanying reports, investigation reports.

arrow