Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

(2018 Goman 684) Defendants requested the victim F(41 tax) who is the main owner of the business for convenience of the Defendant B, who is placed in front of the above convenience store, around 11:30 on December 26, 2017, the E convenience store “E convenience store in front of the above convenience store,” which was located in fathercheon D, the Defendants 1:30 on December 26, 201.

1. Defendant B’s property damage caused damage to the victim at the above date and at the above place, on the ground that there was a harmony between the victim and the driver’s seat in front of the convenience store, which was parked before the convenience store, and caused damage to the victim’s property by walking the string part of the driver’s seat, the driver’s seat, and the rear ridge.

2. Interference with Defendant A’s business;

A. The Defendant: (a) placed the victim the time and place above for the foregoing reasons; (b) placed the heat on the convenience store operated by the victim in order to display the heated articles on a knife onto the knife; (c) there was no money for the victim to calculate; and (d) again, interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbance between 10 minutes and changing the calculation with other articles.

B. Defendant 2-A, on the same ground as indicated in the above Paragraph 2-A, was arrested and released from a police officer in the act of committing an act in the line of duty at the Central District Police Station, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and then found the convenience store again at around 15:00 on the same day, and Defendant 2 obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbance between 10 minutes, such as taking the victim’s bath for the reason that the victim did not receive but did not receive the victim.

(c)

At around 16:00 on the same day, the defendant sought the convenience store again, and if the owner and the owner of the lawsuit are, one unit shall be opened in the Kabter, and the defendant shall not sell the goods to the defendant.

In the end, the victim interfered with the victim's convenience store business by avoiding disturbance, such as 10 minutes of desire, thereby obstructing the victim's convenience store business.

Summary of Evidence

1..