The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, it is just for the court below to have determined that all facts charged of the guilty portion of this case are recognized on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the criminal intent in the crime of defamation, factual time, performance, and joint principal offender, etc., as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, the argument that there was an error of misunderstanding of the legal principles as to a legitimate act in the judgment of the court below among the grounds for appeal is only made by the court of final appeal to the effect that the defendant's appeal is the grounds for appeal, or that the court below did not make ex

B. In addition, even if we look at the judgment below, there is no error of law as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.