The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two months for the crimes of No. 1 and No. 2 in the judgment of the court, and three months for the crimes of No. 3 in the judgment.

Criminal facts

On November 24, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. in the Gwangju District Court’s support on November 24, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 2, 2016. On June 16, 2017, the Gwangju District Court sentenced ten months to imprisonment for a crime of fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 1, 2017.

[2017 Highest 2876]

1. On March 22, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter on the Internet’s website, stating that “The sales of a mobile phone is carried” and sold a mobile phone at KRW 300,000 to the victim who contacted with the Defendant.

was made.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to sell a mobile phone even if he did not receive money from the injured party because he did not have a mobile phone at the

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred KRW 300,000 to the Gwangju Bank Account in the name of pro-Japanese on the same day by the victim.

[2017 Highest 3170]

2. On March 28, 2017, the Defendant sold Aphone SE (Spanish 64g) on the bulletin board of the High Republic of Korea Rober.

The contact request is closed.

E Ministry of Justice

“At the time of sending 350,000 won to the victim F who reported and contacted the mobile phone sales by inserting a mobile phone text message,” “The sending of 350,000 won to the victim F.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to send a mobile phone even if he receives a mobile phone purchase price from the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 350,000 won to the account in G name NongHyup Bank on the same day from the victim.

[2017 Highest 3820]

3. A. The Defendant: (a) around January 8, 2016, at the I mobile phone store in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost, even if he opened the mobile phone under the name of the victim J; and (b) even if he/she intended to dispose of the mobile phone opened in the name of the victim at a different place, the Defendant could not open the Defendant’s cell phone.