A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2018 Highest 819" is a person who operates an E private teaching institute in DoHanam-si D in Gyeonggi-do.

1. The Defendant, on October 2016, invested KRW 70 million in the office of a private teaching institute in the above E E, and 70 million in the victim F, who is interested in the operation of the private teaching institute in the degree of KRW 140,000,000 in selling the E private teaching institute, and will serve as a vice president.

Proceeds shall be 50:50, and investment proceeds shall be returned one year after one year.

“.” The purport was “.

However, the Defendant had no particular property at the time, and the Defendant had accumulated a debt worth of 5-600 million won while operating a private teaching institute, and had been repaid with the borrowed money in the form of preventing the return of the principal and interest of the existing debt, and there was no intention or ability to normally reduce the investment money and the profit even if he received the investment money from the damaged person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, entered 14 victims as shown in the separate crime list (1) from around October 10, 2016 to around January 201, 11, 42,00,000 won for the same month, KRW 5,00,000 won for the 17th of the same month, and KRW 70,000,000 for the 15,000 won for the 25th of the same month, and the Defendant received and received the payment of KRW 75,00,000 for the 75th of the same month. From around that time to January 2018, 25 times from the victims were stated as the "27 times," and as seen below, the Defendant committed fraud against M (as shown in the separate crime list No. 19, 200,000 won for the 19,000 won for the 25th of the same month and the 16th of the same year.

In the past, the sum of 941,730,000 won was obtained through the delivery of the investment funds of private teaching institutes.

2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On April 2017, the Defendant used a computer program in G office located in D, Hanam-si, Hannam-si, with the document title “Lease Agreement”, “No. D Building H in Hanam-si,” and the term of lease.