logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2017.04.14 2017고단98
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 4, 2017, the Defendant was driving a B Poter truck owned by the Defendant over a section of about one kilometer from the front side of the first pharmacy located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si to the roads adjacent to the Changwon school located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant driven the freight truck owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. A photograph description;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act (unlicensed Driving), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and the selection of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, even though the defendant was punished several times for the same crime, there are no unfavorable circumstances, such as the defendant again committed the crime of this case. However, the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the defendant's age, environment, criminal records, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions stated in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, environment, criminal records, criminal records, circumstances after the crime, etc.

arrow