1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

In this case, where the defendant cited the same argument as the argument in the court of first instance as the argument in the court of first instance, this court's reasoning is the same as the statement in the column of reasons in the court of first instance other than the entry as follows. Thus, this court's reasoning is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be stated by the following formula.

⑤ On July 8, 2010, the Deceased purchased the said real estate through sale and purchase by a notary public on July 29, 2010, H, I, J answers, K answers, L answers, M, and N answers, etc. on the part of Incheon Vindication-gun, Incheon. However, the Deceased purchased the said real estate on July 7, 1974, but completed the transfer of ownership by borrowing the name of the Defendant in the name of the Republic of Korea without the name owned by the deceased. However, the Deceased was certified in the confirmation document stating that “The deceased would want to view the said real estate as a joint name among his spouse G, the South and North, the Plaintiffs, and their children.”

In addition, on September 9, 2012, the deceased and wife G, the plaintiffs A, B, C, and the defendant opened a family council related to the distribution of each real estate of this case.

In that place, the deceased and G divided each of the instant real estate into five South Koreas, and the defendant expressed his opinion on the premise that each of the instant real estate was owned by the deceased, on the premise that “I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son, and I am son, so far as I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son.”

Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.