logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.10.24 2011고합213
준강도등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years;

2. Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny;

A. At around 10:00 on April 26, 201, the Defendant stolen the property amounting to KRW 82,600 in the market price by putting it in a steel strawner and a penta and a pentacle, which had been in possession of 10km, such as new shares in the redevelopment zone to be removed in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B. At around 10:00 on April 28, 201, the Defendant stolen the property amounting to KRW 10,000 at the market price by putting 9kg of scrap metal, such as the house franchis and franchising flusing flus, etc., managed by the said victim, and the net flusing and dlusing flus, which were removed from and discharged from the site of the redevelopment zone to be removed in Mapo-gu, Seoul.

C. At around 10:00 on April 30, 201, the Defendant: (a) at the site of the redevelopment area planned to be removed in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, Seoul; (b) at the site of the construction of the redevelopment area, the Defendant: (c) removed 7 km of scrap metal, such as a pentum fluor, etc., in front of the instant victim’s management; and (d) removed pentum and drick, and stolen property equivalent to KRW 7,000,

2. Around 15:30 on May 29, 201, the Defendant attempted to commit robbery, while coloring the victim D’s tap water and scrap metal, such as the pipes, on the second floor of the site of the redevelopment zone planned to be removed in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at the site of the construction site of the redevelopment zone, which was located in Mapo-gu, Seoul, sought one time the victim’s left-hand eye with a view to evading arrest.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to steals property, and assaulted the victim for the purpose of evading arrest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of statement of the police officer regarding D and each protocol of self-examination of the police officer against H, I, and J;

1. Purchase receipt;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraphs 1 through 16 of the seized evidence;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act (a thief and choice of imprisonment) / Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

arrow