logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.11.20 2020노1985
특수상해등
Text

Of the facts stated in the judgment of the first instance, "2020 order 233, 2020 order 302, 2020 order 406" and 2020 order 206.

Reasons

The first instance court sentenced 2 months of imprisonment and 300,000 won of fine for each of the crimes of "20,020,536" among the facts stated in the judgment, and sentenced 10 months of imprisonment for each of the crimes of "20,020,000 won" (the application for compensation by the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed). "20,020, 2020, 2020, 302, 2020, 2020, 406, 2020, 2020, 778."

Therefore, the appeal was filed only for the portion on which the defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment, and the remainder was already separated and finalized.

Therefore, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the crimes of "20 Ma233, 2020 Ma302, 2020 Ma306, 2020 MaMa406, 2020 Ma778" among the crimes in the judgment of the first court and the judgment of the second court.

2. The sentence of imprisonment (10 months of imprisonment) and the sentence of the second sentence (4 months of imprisonment) among the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court of first instance on the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) are too unreasonable, among the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court of first instance.

3. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal for ex officio determination.

The first and second original judgments were rendered on the defendant, and the defendant filed an appeal against each of the crimes in the judgment of the first and second original judgments on the defendant's crimes in the judgment of the second and the second original judgment on the defendant's crimes in the judgment of the first and the second original judgment on the defendant's crimes in the judgment on the second and the second original judgment on the second first and the second original judgment on the defendant's crimes in the second and the second instance on the second first instance. The court decided to jointly examine each of the above crimes.

Of the facts stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the crimes listed in the judgment of the court of first instance concerning "20, 233, 2020, 2020, 2020, 2020, 406, and 2020, 778" and each of the crimes listed in the judgment of the court of second instance concerning "the crimes listed in the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act shall be sentenced to one punishment pursuant to Article 38 (1) of the Criminal Act since the crimes listed in the judgment of the court of first instance are concurrent crimes listed in the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act. Therefore, one of the crimes listed in the judgment of the court of first instance concerning "20, 2020, 302, 200, 406,

arrow