beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 1, 2008, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court's Dong Branch branch, and on September 26, 2008, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime at the Ulsan District Court's Dong Branch.
On April 20, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.225%, driven a approximately 1 km distance prior to the entrance of the water village located in the same Ri on the roads located in the Gluri-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, a Ulsan-gun, the Defendant driven a vehicle of approximately 1 km from the blood alcohol content to the front road of the entrance of the water village located in the same Ri.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, the report on detection of drinking drivers, and the report on blood collection appraisal;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to criminal records and application of each summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The reason for sentencing the proviso to Article 62-2(1) and the proviso to Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend a lecture is that the defendant has been subject to punishment twice due to drinking alcohol, and that there is a high level of drinking alcohol, etc., so a sentence of imprisonment shall be chosen: Provided, That considering the fact that the defendant repents his mistake, and that there is no criminal record other than the fine, it is reasonable and reasonable to pose a risk of recidivism in light of the circumstances leading up to the crime of suspending the execution of punishment and criminal records, etc