The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was committed in a systematic manner against many and unspecified persons; (b) the Defendant took part in the collection of money from the victim; (c) the Defendant took part in the collection of money from the victim; and (d) the Defendant was not able to receive money from the victim; and (c) the Defendant was not able to receive money from the victim; and (d) the Defendant was not able to recover money.

On the other hand, the principle of equity in the case of judgment at the same time with the crime of attempted fraud for which judgment has become final and conclusive is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable on the grounds that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, motive and background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.