A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around November 2019, the Defendant received a proposal from D, “F,” “F,” which was known in the Internet portal site B Kafac,” “F,” which is one of its own, paid KRW 4,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

On November 24, 2019, at around 02:33, the Defendant: (a) laid down a vinyl after the said vinyl; (b) removed the locking device; and (c) removed the locking device; and (d) laid down and delivered three the widths in the time frame prepared and delivered in advance by the said vinyl; and (c) laid down the said vinyl, through the wall of the said vinyl, once the said vinyl was entirely 1 unit, and the “I” vinyl operated by the victim H, which was located adjacent to the said vinyl.

Accordingly, the defendant destroyed the structure owned by the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement about D, H and G;

1. Each investigation report [Attachment of CCTV images verification related to the process of delivering the crimes A and A in the vicinity of theJ, attaching a photograph of messages given to and received from a teacher at the time of committing the crime to a mobile phone of the suspect A, and a copy of the suspect interrogation protocol of the suspect suspect];

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. In light of the applicable provisions of Article 166(1) of the Criminal Act with regard to criminal facts, the prosecutor appears to have prosecuted to the effect that each general structure and fire prevention is an ordinary concurrent crime.

However, even if multiple buildings were destroyed by one fire, they are destroyed by each fire.