logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2012.09.06 2012고정630
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 14, 201, the Defendant: (a) in the E University lecture room located in Dong-si, Jung-si, the Government of the Republic of Korea; (b) despite that the Defendant did not die of the F Religious Organization G, the Defendant did not sell any food to the students; (c) but (d) in the first and third years of the beauty design department, “If many students live in the F Religious Organization, it is difficult to see that many students live in the Chang-si, thereby making it difficult for them to do so; (d) this case was found to have been reported to the public. This is because the Defendant found that there were many kinds of Gacs in the Internet, and that it would be difficult to find it difficult for those who are different owners of Gacs to be frighted, and how they died, it would be false that the instant religious organization would damage the reputation of the victims of G by publicly expressing that it would be subject to damage the religious organization.”

2. 피고인은 2011. 11. 4. 위 제1항과 같은 장소에서 같은 30여명의 학생들에게 “이 사람이 누구냐면 F종교단체 G이라는 사람이에요, 죽었죠, 이 사람도 F종교단체 지금 뭐 엄청나게 뭐 그 제가 한번 읽어 줬죠 수업시간에 읽어줬던 거 G님의 이름으로 간구 한다는 거 자 이것은 G씨가 여러분들 라면 먹다가 죽었을 때 그 조서를 경찰들이 꾸몄던 그런 거구요”라며 공연히 F종교단체 창시자 G에 대한 허위사실을 적시함으로써 G을 신앙의 대상으로 하는 피해자 F종교단체에 대한 명예를 훼손하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Application of statutes governing judgment and recording;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. As to the assertion of the accused and the defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of the workhouse.

arrow