logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.11.21 2019가단245443
손해배상(자)
Text

1. On January 29, 2019, E vehicle is behind the vehicle, at the entrance of the G-dong parking lot of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, while the vehicle was behind the vehicle.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On January 29, 2019, around 21:58, 2019, the Plaintiff: (a) specified the date and time of the instant accident in accordance with the Plaintiff’s certificate No. 1; (b) however, the Plaintiff would specify the date and time of the instant accident in accordance with the Plaintiff’s Certificate No. 1 (Evidence No. 1). E (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”).

) HA vehicle owned by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) under stop on the rear part while driving the vehicle at the entrance of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fdong parking lot.

3) The Plaintiff 1 et al. (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”) caused an accident where the Plaintiff 1 et al. al. were shocked by the Defendant 1.

(2) Due to the instant accident, the Defendant’s vehicle suffered damages, such as the landing of the front driver.

3) The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement for the Plaintiff’s vehicle. [The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement for the Plaintiff’s vehicle (the fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap

B. According to the facts as seen earlier prior to recognition of liability, the Defendant suffered damages due to the operation of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and thus, the Plaintiff is liable to compensate the Defendant for the damages caused by the instant accident as the mutual aid business operator of the Plaintiff

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. In light of the purport of the entire arguments in the statements in Evidence Nos. 2, 3, 7, and 8, it is recognized that the Defendant paid the sum of KRW 1,778,953 ( KRW 1,228,953 + 550,000 + the repair cost of the Defendant’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

Therefore, the repair cost due to the instant accident is KRW 1,778,953.

B. While the Defendant asserts that the Defendant spent 2.1 million won (per 21 days x 100,000 won) at the rental car expense for 21 days during the period of repairing the Defendant’s vehicle due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff asserts that the amount of 672,00 won (per 4 days x 168,000 won) should be calculated as the rental expense (per 4 days x 168,00 won) due to the repair period.

arrow