A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On January 17, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for four months as a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) in the Gwangju District Court's net support on January 17, 2019. The above judgment became final and conclusive on May 24, 2019.

[2] Although the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was drinking and drinking B, he prepared a written agreement with B on May 9, 2018, and followed the same year.

6.20. Gyeongci and police officer:

7. Around 13. Around 13.m., that it was not in line with our good will to arrange for an agreement with C or D which is another perpetrator.

The Court asked B to the effect that the statement “........”

B In this regard, from the law court of 314 of 2018, the Gwangju District Court's Mancheon-ro located in Mancheon-si around September 6, 2018 to take an oath by attending as a witness of the case of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. by Defendant A (joint assault) at the above court's order 2017 Godan 2984.

The prosecutor’s question “I would like to see, at that time, I made a wrong statement (at the time when the investigative agency made the statement).”

“False testimony was made to the effect that the testimony was “.”

Accordingly, the defendant caused B to give false testimony and abetted B to give perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Previous records on CCTV images of the police protocol on the examination of the suspect B, a copy of the examination protocol of the prosecutor's office concerning the case No. 2, 2017 order order No. 2984 of witness B, the defendant's partial statement of the court: A copy of each court decision, and the summary of the defendant's assertion on the defendant's legal statement of the defendant as to the defendant B on the examination protocol of the suspect interrogation of the prosecutor's office concerning the case No. 2, 2017 order No. 2984; the defendant requested the defendant to make the statement to that effect first, and the defendant did not have the intention to make a false statement to

2. Determination

A. According to each of the above evidence, the following facts can be acknowledged.

(i)..