The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable as to the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. However, the defendant recognized and reflected the crime.

The defendant was a young young person who has not exceeded the age of 20 years of age, and was flick in difficult family circumstances.

However, the instant crime committed several times at night, theft of property by impairing another person’s structure, and acquisition of profits by using a stolen card several times, etc., and is not good enough to commit the crime.

Although the Defendant had been punished twice due to the same theft crime and received multiple juvenile protective orders, the Defendant again committed the instant crime. In full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.