The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) was divided into about 15 minutes between the victim and the victim who was landed immediately after the accident, and the defendant left the place of accident to deliver the name cards to the victim and did not return to the scene.

to the extent that there was an intentional escape

It shall not be readily concluded.

The instant traffic accident was extremely insignificant, and the victim was diagnosed to the effect that the stability of the drilling, the tensions, and the tensions is necessary after the instant traffic accident, but did not receive any special treatment otherwise.

Then, the victim suffered injury under the Criminal Act due to the damage of the physical integrity and failure to maintain a living function due to the traffic accident in the instant case, or due to the bad health condition changed.

shall not be deemed to exist.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, which erred by misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In full view of the following circumstances admitted by the lower court and the appellate court based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated, the Defendant’s assertion in this part is rejected, on the ground that, inasmuch as the Defendant was found to have escaped from the scene of an accident without notifying the victim of whom the person who caused the accident was aware of who caused the accident, without taking relief measures, etc., even though he injured the victim G by traffic accident

① On March 15, 2015, the Defendant her drinking alcohol from around 23:00 to around 02:00 following the following day, and, on March 16, 2015, the Defendant stopped and stopped a vehicle owned by the J on board to find a place where the vehicle can be parked under the condition that the alcohol is short of drinking on March 16, 2015, and received the said traffic accident (hereinafter “the instant accident”). ② The Defendant left the vehicle after the instant accident, while driving the vehicle under the influence of the Defendant, while driving the vehicle in the direction behind the Defendant’s proceeding, and was a victim’s driver’s vehicle under the signal signal in the direction (hereinafter “the instant accident”).