All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the facts charged in the instant case were guilty and ordered to disclose information about the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) for five years. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence and exceeding the bounds of logical and empirical rules

2. In light of the character, conduct, age, family environment, the background, means and method of the crime of the sexual assault of this case, and the relationship with the victim with regard to the request for attachment order, the judgment of the court below ordering the attachment of an electronic tracking device for 10 years on the ground that the defendant committed a sexual crime and was at risk of recidivism is just, and there is no violation of law as

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.