logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.05.09 2013노181
사기미수
Text

All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The prosecutor appealed the part not guilty among the judgment below for the following reasons.

Defendant

A In light of the fact that, immediately after the accident occurred, Defendant B had an employee of the Dong Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd”) stated that Defendant B was on the F’s vehicle (if the F’s intent to conceal the F’s driving of drinking, it is sufficient to refer to a police officer). Defendant A, as a taxi driver, could have sufficiently known that, if the insurance report was made as above, damage (the insurance money paid to the Defendant B, the self-charges and the premium that the insurance company can receive from the insured, etc. if the accident of drinking driving was properly reported) occurred, may be recognized that Defendant A had an intention to defraud.

Considering that Defendant B first mentioned that Defendant B was an employee of the insurance company on the day of the accident that he was boarding the F’s vehicle, and that Defendant A also talked as above, and that Defendant B agreed to compensate Defendant A for KRW 3.2 million, Defendant B may also be acknowledged that there was a public offering of deceptiveation in order or secret.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts that the court below acquitted Defendant A of the part concerning the charge of this case, among the charges of this case, and acquitted Defendant B of the part concerning the charge of this case, and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination:

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case (as indicated in the written application for changes in indictment on December 7, 2012) is Defendant B and Defendant A and E are taxi drivers.

On December 3, 2011, at around 02:00, the GF driver's G driver's G driver's negligence due to the failure of the F driver's driver's negligence on the part of the driver's or on the part of the driver's prior to the driver's operation of the H driver's H driver's, and the shock.

arrow