The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won in punishment, and forty hours in order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The instant case is an indecent act committed by the Defendant against the victim’s sexual intercourse on the part of the subway where the Defendant is densely concentrated, such as booming the victim’s sexual intercourse, raining, etc.

At the time, the victim seems to feel a significant sense of sexual humiliation and fear.

The defendant continued to deny his criminal act in an investigative agency.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unfeasible and unreasonable, and the prosecutor’s above assertion is without merit, inasmuch as the Defendant’s punishment is too unfasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.