Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant, who was aware of the victim C(19) and about 10 years prior to the victim C(19 years old), is a person with disabilities of class 2 with intellectual disability, and C’s victim D(19 years old) for pro-Japanese arrest is a person with disabilities of class 3 with intellectual disability.
On January 17, 2014, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victims of the said PC in order to have knee, knee, knee, etc. in the middle floor of the “FPC room” on the second floor of the Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, on the following occasions: (b) the victims of the said PC were knee, knee, knee, etc. in turn; (c) the victim’s face was taken by hand; (d) the victim C’s face was knee, and knee kne kne,
2. A special assault Defendant assaulted the victims at the time of the day set forth in paragraph 1 above, and continued to assault the victim C, D, her women-friendly G, G’s son H, and the victim C, with a chain ( length, thickness) that is a dangerous object in the surrounding area, made the victim her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers her
Summary of Evidence
1. The legal statement of the witness C, and the protocol of examination of the witness D;
1. Recording notes of the police statements of C;
1. The second police statement statement about H [H appears in this court as a witness and stated to the effect that all the facts charged of the instant case are false, and it was stated that the Defendant’s statement at an investigative agency was made in accordance with the direction of C by intimidation from C. However, H’s statement in this court is difficult to believe that H’s statement in light of the degree of testimony in this court, the relationship between H and the Defendant, etc., and rather, it is true that the investigative agency’s statement corresponds to specific statements and major parts of the victims’ statement, and thus, it can be reliable.]
1..