1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim against the above cancellation portion is dismissed.

3.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is operating a daylight shop in front of the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu C, and the defendant is operating a daylight shop in both sides at the above place.

나. 피고는 “피고가 2014. 1. 10. 15:20경 부천시 원미구 D에 있는 E시장 맞은편 ‘F옷가게’ 앞 노상에서, 알지 못하는 이유로 원미구청 소속 직원들이 노점상 단속을 나오자 사실은 원고가 구청에 단속을 해달라고 민원을 넣은 사실이 없음에도 불구하고, G(떡볶이 노점상), H(야채 노점상), I(야채 노점상) 등 여러 명의 노점상 상인들이 듣고 있는 가운데 ‘과일장사를 하는 A이 수시로 민원을 구청에 넣어서 단속이 나왔다.’고 소리침으로써 공연히 허위사실을 적시하여 원고의 명예를 훼손하였다.”는 범죄사실로 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014고약6487호로 명예훼손죄로 약식기소되어, 2014. 9. 5. 위 법원에서 약식명령이 내려졌다.

C. After that, the Defendant filed a request for formal trial against the above summary order, but the court of first instance (Seoul District Court 2014 High Court 2014 High Court 1144) declared the Defendant guilty of a fine of KRW 70,000. D.

On June 18, 2015, the appellate court (Seoul District Court 2014No4462) rendered a judgment of innocence against the defendant, against which the defendant raised an appeal against this, and this judgment has the same year.

6. 26. A final and conclusive date.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion No. 1-B.

In addition to the plaintiff, H, and G's statements, there are letters, notes, and statements, which contain the J's statements, as stated in the facts of finding a port.

Since the plaintiff suffered mental damage due to defamation by the defendant, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money of KRW 3 million to the plaintiff.

(b) judgment;