The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In doing so, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence by violating logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the meaning of “necessary measures” under Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the intent of escape.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.