1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiffs falling under the following order of additional payment.

1. The scope of the judgment of this court requested the defendant to pay the settlement money for cash stated in the purport of the claim against the plaintiff. The first instance court accepted the plaintiff's 87,984,751 won and delay damages for the plaintiff's Da, the 137,49,14 won and delay damages for the plaintiff's Da, and the 137,49,144 won and delay damages for the plaintiff's Da should have been borne by the plaintiffs as a member of the association from among the expenses of the association's business until the plaintiff lost its membership due to the cause of cash settlement occurred. In other words, the plaintiff's total project expenses for the plaintiff's e.g., the e., the 1 real estate of J apartment as stated in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1 real estate of the e.g., the 2 real estate of the e., the e., the e., the e., the remaining 9,515,249 won and damages for delay damages for the plaintiff's.

Therefore, the appeal after the remand is limited to the appeal after the above reversal.

2. Basic facts

A. On July 3, 2008, the Defendant is a reconstruction association which obtained the authorization of the incorporation from the Yongsan-gu mayor on July 3, 2008 for the purpose of the J apartment reconstruction project with the land and L land as a project implementation district.

Plaintiff

A is the owner of the first real estate, and the plaintiff C was the owner of the second real estate and was the defendant's member.

B. The Defendant on February 5, 2010