logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2012.12.21 2012고단1851
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 10, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “D” operated by the victim C, who was in the Seocho-si, Yangman-si, the Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million in the case of borrowing KRW 20 million in the case of borrowing KRW 24 million in the case of borrowing KRW 20 million in the case of having borrowed KRW 24 million in the case of borrowing KRW 24 million in the case of having no money.”

However, at the time, the Defendant had a debt amounting to 40 million to 50 million won, but did not have any special property, and as such, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the debt even if she borrowed money from the victim because the Defendant was in a bad and bad situation with the intent to do so.

The Defendant received KRW 20 million from the victim to the Defendant’s corporate bank account (F) on or around September 10, 201.

2. On September 27, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant “D” to the Victim C, stating, “A contract deposit of KRW 20,00,000 is required to remove the Seoul G building. When a removal contract is concluded, the Defendant would make a total of KRW 50,00,000,000,000,000,0000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

However, the Defendant was only liable as stated in the preceding paragraph and did not have any special property, and the 20 million won received from the preceding paragraph had already been used in full for the Defendant’s repayment of his/her personal obligation. On September 25, 201, the said G building removal contract had already been destroyed, and there was no intent or ability to repay the loan even if he/she borrowed money from the victim because he/she had been able to use the money for the full repayment of the Defendant’s obligation.

On September 27, 2011, the Defendant received 20 million won from the victim to the Defendant’s corporate bank account (F) under the pretext of the borrowed money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The second interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant C.

arrow