logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.06.15 2011가합59693
약정금
Text

1. Defendant B’s ratio of KRW 385,635,938 to the Plaintiff and 20% per annum from August 31, 2011 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From August 2008, F, the representative director of the Plaintiff (the trade name was changed from “Co., Ltd. D” to “Co. E”, and the name was changed to the present trade name), who is the representative director, issued five copies of promissory notes with face value, etc. in blank to Defendant B.

B. In order to find out whether the bill of exchange is discounted, Defendant B was able to see whether the bill was discounted, and G did not find out the place where H was discounted, even though one of them was puled to H, and the said bill was recovered to the representative director F.

After that, several bills were delivered to H through Defendant B and G, but the bills were eventually recovered to F by the Plaintiff’s representative director.

C. Around September 18, 2008, Defendant B heard that a bill discount can be made by H, and the Plaintiff’s representative director F received a bill of promissory notes issued by the Plaintiff from H (I; hereinafter “instant bill”) and sent it to H through G.

(H At the time the bill of this case was drawn off, the face value column was 300,000,000 won at the time the bill of this case was drawn off. (D)

H, around September 25, 2008, delivered the Promissory Notes to J [a] B at the time of delivery, K (K) at the time of delivery stated 528,00,000 won in the face value column of the Promissory Notes], while J, under its management, did not pay the discount amount for the Promissory Notes (a trade name before alteration: M) as the goods payment obligation for the SOS Co., Ltd., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd., a Co., Ltd. (a company before alteration: hereinafter “SOS Cable Co., Ltd.)’s commercial name).

Accordingly, H attempted to recover the Promissory Notes from J and Sejong Cable, an employee of the Plaintiff, but failed to recover the Promissory Notes.

E. Meanwhile, Defendant B drafted the foregoing N andO around September 2008.

arrow