logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.02.17 2013고단8345
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Kaman vehicle.

On October 21, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on a 09:20-round 09:20, and driven the front distance of the Dongcheon North square, Incheon East-gu, Incheon, toward the direction of the normal distance from the side of the side of the bridge. On October 21, 2013, the Defendant turned to the left at 30-40km each hour among the two-lane roads.

The place is a crosswalk with a vehicle and pedestrian signal, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle by checking whether there is a person who renders the vehicle driving service, by complying with the signal, by reducing the speed, and by checking the front, rear, and right and the right of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left in violation of the vehicle signal, and caused the victim C(70 years of age)'s buckbucks on the right side in violation of the pedestrian signal from the left side of the driving direction of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim in the above occupational negligence, i.e., the right satisfaction and the closed frame that require approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on traffic accidents;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 3 (1) and (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Selection of Fines, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Jan. 2, 2006);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow