1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 8, 2002, the Plaintiff was an employee who had worked as a cook of “B,” a construction company, and was in the course of performing the work on the outer wall of about 7 meters high on the outer wall of October 8, 2002.

B. The Plaintiff was diagnosed as a main injury and injury by the aforesaid occupational accident, such as “the pressure minculverization of the sixth degree, dump damage (unsatisfying),” and the injury and injury, as “dual alley, the hemal hemal hemal hemal hemosis, the hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hem

However, according to the plaintiff's insurance benefit ledger, it seems that the medical care period was extended by May 1, 2008 with the approval of the medical care plan.

C. After closing medical care as above, the Plaintiff was determined by the Defendant as Class 2 Subparagraph 5 of the disability grade (a person who needs to have a significant disability in the function or mental function of the relevant nursing system from time to time and has been continuously paid nursing benefits until June 30, 2013).

On September 18, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim for nursing benefits with the Defendant for the nursing period, “from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015,” without claiming the long-term nursing benefits.

E. Accordingly, on February 19, 2016, the defendant's current state of the plaintiff's "for the plaintiff on February 19, 2016, the need for nursing is weak as it is better than before because it is possible for the plaintiff to self-help, but the present state is likely to be gradually improved over several years, and it is impossible to confirm the past state.

“For the reasons that it is, on September 18, 2015, notified that the claim for the nursing benefits from September 18, 2015 should be paid in advance, but from January 20, 2016, the notice was given to the effect that it is decided to be changed as non-subject of nursing benefits.

The plaintiff.