(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.22 2016나2039864

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.22 2016나2039864

회장임기확인

Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act citing the judgment of the court of first instance, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part related only to Codefendant C of the court of first instance, which is 8, 20, 20-13, excluding the part related only to Codefendant C) shall be cited as

However, some of the following shall be used, and the decision on the starting date of the term of office as the chairperson of the plaintiff branch of the plaintiff B shall be added.

2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance 2 pages 1, 2016, the phrase “as of April 14, 2016,” “as of April 15, 2016,” “as of April 13, 2016.” The phrase “10 minutes” in the judgment of first instance 6, 30, 8, and 12 shall be read as “10 minutes.” The phrase “However, the Plaintiff is disputing the validity of the disciplinary decision of this case as of 2016Gahap1903 with the Seoul Central District Court 2016Gahap1903, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Federation of this case to seek confirmation of invalidity of the disciplinary decision of this case on June 2, 2016, and received the above Plaintiff’s claim from the above court on June 2, 2016, and the judgment of the Seoul High Court 201Da36164, Jun. 2, 2016.”

As the same page, the term “a non-corporate body” in the following four acts shall be read as “aC, etc.”. The term “AC” in the first instance judgment shall be read as “aC, etc.” and the term “AC” in the 33th sentence, 34th sentence, and 8th sentence below as “Operational Rules.” The term “AC” in the 35th sentence in the first instance judgment shall be read as “AC, etc..”.

To the extent that the meeting of various levels of the first instance court's 42 pages 1 to 3 is not contrary to the articles of association and the operating rules of the first instance court, the results of the meeting shall be approved by the next higher level of the meeting, and the rules of the relevant various levels shall be approved.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2019.03.29 2018누65905

-서울고등법원(춘천) 2020.04.22 2019나51763

-서울고등법원 2017.10.17 2017나2031775

-부산고등법원 (창원) 2018.12.13 2017나24222

-서울고등법원 2019.09.27 2018나2068484