A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Around December 6, 2011, the Defendant entered into a sales contract with the land owner, G, and the land owner of the relevant land with H, D, E, and F,Hanam-si, which is a development restriction zone.

1. Any person without permission for development activities shall obtain permission from the competent authorities to construct a building, change the use of a building, install a structure, change the form and quality of land, etc. in a development restriction zone;

Nevertheless, without the permission of the competent authorities, the defendant

A. A. On July 2012, 201, in the form and quality of a forest D, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, by cutting down stone as a pokele, and changing the ground by doing cutting and flating work;

(b) changing the form and quality of trees, such as felling forest trees into the E forest land of 265 square meters on October 2012;

(c) install a fence on August 2013 using a steel pipe box, etc. on a F forest land of 275 square meters, around August 2013;

(d) newly constructing a warehouse with a wooden stone, etc. on the 9m22 square meters of F Forest land around September 2013;

E. Around December 27, 2013, a residential building is newly constructed using a steel pipe board, etc. on a steel pipe board, etc. with a capacity of 54 square meters prior to C before C, and

(f) around March 2014; (f) damage forest land by paralleling the ground on a F forest land of 180 square meters; and

G. Around June 2014, around F and C forest land 170 square meters, the Plaintiff used the glue site to change the form and quality.

2. A person who violates a restriction on activities in a development restriction zone with respect to land for which a corrective order has not been complied with shall comply with a corrective order issued by the competent authority on the ground of such violation;

On April 24, 2014, the Defendant received a corrective order to restore the same illegal act as the above paragraph (1) from the lower Mayor to the original state on May 20, 2014, but did not comply with it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. A business trip name, a letter of business trip, and an on-site photograph;

1. A written investigation of offenses and field photographs;

1. A written investigation of violation;

1. Current status photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Part IV of the corrective order;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 32 of the Act on Special Measures for Designation and Management of Areas of Restricted Development concerning facts constituting a crime;