beta
Text
1. With respect to F forest land of 5,650 square meters in Cheongdo-gun, Cheongbuk-do, the respective points are indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 1.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff shares 4824/5650 shares, Defendant B’s share 496/5650 shares, and Defendant D’s share 330/5650 shares in F forest land, Cheongbuk-do, Cheongbuk-do, Cheongbuk-do (hereinafter “instant land”).
B. The Plaintiff and the Defendants did not reach an agreement on the method of dividing the instant land.
C. The Defendants installed graves on the instant land.
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of Gap evidence No. 4, purport of whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. Since the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared the instant land, and no agreement was reached between the parties on the method of dividing the instant land, the Plaintiff may file a claim against the Defendants for the partition of the instant land, which is jointly owned.
B. As to the method of dividing the land of this case, the result of the appraiser G’s survey and appraisal, and the result of the appraisal and appraisal entrusted to the Cheongdo governor of the Korea Land Information Corporation to the Cheongdo-gun of this court, the use status of the land of this case, the utility and shape of the land of this case, the location of the defendants’ graves located on the land of this case, and Defendant B did not have any special objection to dividing the land of this case as prescribed in paragraph (1) of this case. Even if the land of this case is subdivided as prescribed in paragraph (1) of this case, it is located within the part of the attached Form (C). However, as alleged by Defendant D, if the land of this case is subdivided as of the direction of the graves of Defendant D party, it would be deemed that the land owned by the Plaintiff would be located in the middle of the land owned by the Plaintiff and the utility of the land owned by the Plaintiff would be considerably reduced. In light of the Plaintiff and the Defendants’ share ratio of ownership of the land of this case.