1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) simultaneously with the delivery of movable property stated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract for the supply of goods and a product supply contract with the Defendant to be supplied with cosmetics and sirens, which the Defendant had the right to manufacture and sell (hereinafter “instant contract for the supply of goods”) and continued to maintain transactional relationship. On June 26, 2017, the Plaintiff terminated the instant contract for the supply of goods under mutual agreement (hereinafter “instant termination agreement”), and the contents of the termination agreement are as follows.

A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “A”) and A (hereinafter referred to as “B”) shall terminate a contract for supply of goods, and agree as follows:

The term "A" and "B" shall terminate a contract for the supply of cosmetics of C, D brand, and C, C, C, and C, C, C, and C, C, C, and C, C, and C, and C,

The term "B" shall suspend the operation of the online and offline site operated to distribute products of C and D brands in China and Taiwan area.

Provided, That the goods already supplied to Taiwan shall be sold by the time of exhaustion.

By July 30, 2017, "B" shall be accepted by a person designated by "A" or "A" at an amount of 80% of the amount purchased by "B" until July 30, 2017.

The term "B" shall maintain and transfer the relevant product's packaging in a salable state.

B. The Plaintiff’s purchase amount (i.e., 80%) of the Plaintiff’s inventory products purchased from the Defendant from July 30, 2017 to the date of sale (hereinafter “instant inventory products”) on which the Plaintiff had not sold the inventory products (i.e., 40% of the Plaintiff’s inventory products) was totaled of KRW 89,670,354, and the details thereof are as indicated in the separate sheet.

C. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff agreed on the instant contract for the supply of the goods prior to the Defendant’s refusal to accept the instant inventory goods.